Deleted in 10 minutes , bet

I agree 100%, I have no idea why is this not a thing. To me all players that registered are just like challengers that need to prove they're better than last month's winner of the avatar but that can't be proven if the last month's winner can't even get into the tournament.

Elite is a big big bullshit. Look at Lapiris, you never can have place without elite, every fking month same players that have elite, others have no chance to join. Afterall the monthly tournaments should be about challenge. Remove elite or add max 4x elite registers. Tbh i dont think anyone of the decent players that go to tour care if they would fight another guy from other server, actually you want some good fights, thats the purpose of the monthly tournament (speaking about this cause was kinda one of the "arguments" against no elite). Not everyone can play daily to get elite and everyone should have a chance to join their class tournament...Best solution for this would be the removing of elite or to put max 4 elite registers, so there will still be elites and also players that will have a fair chance to join or to add more tournament slots (i think this would be hard to implement and also after many fights maybe you would be "tired" in final).
Also if this would be added it would be good to be able to register only 1 character for the respective class per ip (ip class) / pc so there won't be more characters registered from the same person (idk if you could implement something like this tho). This is an important subject so would be nice to get some good answers.

FALLENGAY ENJOY FREE WIN I WENT FALKI WITH WARRIOR YEEEEEEEEEEEEE XDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD

Fallengay had a good idea , whoaaah I'm impressed

RATTENROLAND wrote:

FALLENGAY ENJOY FREE WIN I WENT FALKI WITH WARRIOR YEEEEEEEEEEEEE XDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD

YEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

Ostdeutschland. Seil Hieg

I don't think it's a good idea.

We have a couple of players who come to the game once a month and only for the tournament.

Whether they win the tournament or not, they are AFK for whole next month and just come back to the next tournament.

In fact I would make an application for a tournament more expensive and non-tradable (maybe even add other criteria to support play to win system)

The tournament is once a month. So it makes sense to have an elites that supports play to win system.

I think that letting the person who won the previous tournament in 100% is only a good idea if you combine it with the idea that only active players can apply at all. If you have to be active to be able to apply and you have to be active to be able to "defend" your title by getting a free invite, thats something I could agree with.

ElynCZ wrote:

I don't think it's a good idea.

We have a couple of players who come to the game once a month and only for the tournament.

Whether they win the tournament or not, they are AFK for whole next month and just come back to the next tournament.

In fact I would make an application for a tournament more expensive and non-tradable (maybe even add other criteria to support play to win system)

The tournament is once a month. So it makes sense to have an elites that supports play to win system.

Some have different opinions about the monthly tournament, for me should be a fight between best players of that class or something like this (challenging, not everytime same ppl), be if from other server or not or if he plays or not after tour. This is a game afterall, you shouldn't be forced to play everyday to get elite because otherwise you cant get place in tour.